The Lord’s Day
November 2, 2008
”O No! More Names”
Dr. Derek W. H.
Now, I was explaining to our missionary guests tonight that
he had come on the night when I had a clunker of a text. I knew this chapter
was coming, of course, a long time ago. And worse than that, in some ways,
we’ve read this list of names before, because this list of names occurs in Ezra
This is like a Hall of Fame. (Now have I won over the
sporty types? I too have XM/Sirius radio [laughter], but I had no idea
that SEC football was on it! [Laughter.] I did notice they took away my
Imagine with me visiting a museum. We had a rule of
thumb when I was younger and I was raising my children and we would go
somewhere. For every fun thing that we did in whatever city we happened to be
in, there had to be a visit to a museum. That was the pay-back for the fun
thing, because history is important. Now if you don’t think history is
important, then you’ve already been sold over to post-modernity. You have
rewritten your own history. In the corridor out there, if you make a bee-line in
the direction I’m pointing now, there’s the History Room. I wonder how many of
you have been in it. It’s a fascinating place…pictures and memorabilia, and I
imagine all kinds of archival material, better kept than any church I’ve ever
seen in my entire life. It’s a historian’s dream. Whoever writes the history of
First Presbyterian Church over its many, many decades will just glow, I think,
when they walk into that History Room because much of the work has been done for
But there’s a problem. Not just the fact that
there’s a list of names; it’s the fact that this list of names which occurs
again (or has occurred) in Ezra 2 is different. It’s not exactly the same,
although it’s meant to be the same. As we’ll see in a moment, Nehemiah is
reading the list that Ezra made. But when you look at the list, it’s not exactly
the same. There are different names and there are different numbers.
Now, numbers were the bane of copyists’ lives. When
you try to remember a number and you copy it, the risk of not copying the same
number is increased exponentially. Now this raises a problem. It raises a
difficult problem. It raises a sensitive problem. If these are meant to be the
same lists, how can I trust the Bible if there is a difference? Now that maybe
doesn’t disturb you. It should disturb you…it really should disturb you, because
we believe the Bible to be infallible and inerrant. At least we believe that the
original autographs as they were originally written are infallible and inerrant,
but we also believe that in the whole business of copying the original to the
texts that we have with us today — a fascinating and difficult process, and
there’s a science behind it — we believe that we can fully trust the copies of
the copies of the copies of the copies and so on that we have and hold in our
hands here tonight.
But there are differences. How do we explain the
differences? Now for me to point out what those differences are would be a work
of supererogation. It would be massively complicated and
I would bore you to tears and you’d fall asleep. You can
consult on them. Here’s what we do. The first thing that we do is this: we never
let go of our belief that the Bible is infallible and inerrant, and we never let
go of that truth because Jesus believed that. Jesus believed that. That’s a safe
place to be. Whatever problems there might be in the Old Testament, there were
problems in the Old Testament that Jesus read, and He believed the Bible to be
infallible and inerrant, and that’s the place I want to be. I don’t care who it
is who is pontificating this or that problem, I want to be where Jesus is.
That’s the first thing. I believe the Bible to be infallible:
“All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine
and reproof and correction and instruction in the way of righteousness, that the
man of God might be thoroughly furnished unto every good work.”
Now that being said, it is possible that the
explanation for the differences between the two lies not in the original but in
the copies that were made. Those differences are so minor, they are so
miniscule they don’t affect any essential doctrine whatsoever, nor do they
affect my belief that the Bible is infallible and inerrant.
But I don’t have to go that route, because ninety
years has passed since Ezra first wrote that list in Ezra 2. Now ninety years
can do a lot of things. For example, after Ezra had written that list in Ezra 2,
some might have been born. There might have been new additions to the family
which would have immediately altered the numbers, and rather than Nehemiah say,
‘Look, we’ve altered the numbers now to take into consideration those who were
born immediately after Ezra’s list,’ it’s already been done. It’s possible that
others joined Zerubbabel and Ezra. Maybe illness, maybe looking after an aged
parent back in Babylon in the Persian Empire made it impossible for them to
come, but after they had seen some of their own family surviving for ten,
fifteen years in Jerusalem, they themselves might have made that journey and
they were added to a subsequent list. The archives that were kept were altered,
and maybe that’s what Nehemiah is now reflecting.
What am I saying? I’m saying there are all kinds of
possible explanations, none of which require me to say, ‘Well, there you go. You
can’t trust the Bible.’ Now if you go to college, if you go to certain
seminaries, that’s the immediate recourse: there’s a problem in the Bible, you
can’t trust the Bible. No. There’s a problem in the Bible, but there are good
explanations, possible explanations to overcome those problems.
Now. I just wanted to say that before I start reading
this list of names. Let’s turn to Nehemiah 7, and we’re going to begin at verse
5; and before we read the passage together, let’s look to God in prayer.
Lord, this is Your word. From heaven You breathed
it out and gave it to us to help us, to instruct us, to encourage us, to rebuke
us, to teach us many things, to lead us to Jesus. Now bless us, we pray, as we
read this word together. We ask it for Jesus’ sake. Amen.
my God put it into my heart to assemble the nobles and the officials and the
people to be enrolled by genealogy. And I found the book of the genealogy of
those who came up at the first, and I found written in it:
were the people of the province who came up out of the captivity of those exiles
whom Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had carried into exile. They returned to
Jerusalem and Judah, each to his town.
came with Zerubbabel, Jeshua, Nehemiah, Azariah, Raamiah, Nahamani, Mordecai,
Bilshan, Mispereth, Bigvai, Nehum, Baanah.
The number of the men of the people of Israel:
sons of Parosh, 2,172.
sons of Shephatiah, 372.
sons of Arah, 652.
sons of Pahath-moab, namely the sons of Jeshua and Joab, 2,818.
sons of Elam, 1,254.
sons of Zattu, 845.
sons of Zaccai, 760.
sons of Binnui, 648.
sons of Bebai, 628.
sons of Azgad, 2,322.
sons of Adonikam, 667.
sons of Bigvai, 2,067.
sons of Adin, 655.
sons of Ater, namely of Hezekiah, 98.
sons of Hashum, 328.
sons of Bezai, 324.
sons of Hariph, 112.
sons of Gibeon, 95.
men of Bethlehem and Netophah, 188.
men of Anathoth, 128.
men of Beth-azmaveth, 42.
men of Kiriath-jearim, Chephirah, and Beeroth, 743.
men of Ramah and Geba, 621.
men of Michmas, 122.
men of Bethel and Ai, 123.
men of the other Nebo, 52.
sons of the other Elam, 1,254.
sons of Harim, 320.
sons of Jericho, 345.
sons of Lod, Hadid, and Ono, 721.
sons of Senaah, 3,930.
priests: the sons of Jedaiah, namely the house of Jeshua, 973.
sons of Immer, 1,052.
sons of Pashhur, 1,247.
sons of Harim, 1,017.
Levites: the sons of Jeshua, namely of Kadmiel of the sons of Hodevah, 74.
singers: the sons of Asaph, 148.
gatekeepers: the sons of Shallum, the sons of Ater, the sons of Talmon, the sons
of Akkub, the sons of Hatita, the sons of Shobai, 138.
temple servants: the sons of Ziha, the sons of Hasupha, the sons of Tabbaoth,
sons of Keros, the sons of Sia, the sons of Padon,
sons of Lebana, the sons of Hagaba, the sons of Shalmai,
sons of Hanan, the sons of Giddel, the sons of Gahar,
sons of Reaiah, the sons of Rezin, the sons of Nekoda,
sons of Gazzam, the sons of Uzza, the sons of Paseah,
sons of Besai, the sons of Meunim, the sons of Nephushesim,
sons of Bakbuk, the sons of Hakupha, the sons of Harhur,
sons of Bazlith, the sons of Mehida, the sons of Harsha,
sons of Barkos, the sons of Sisera, the sons of Temah,
sons of Neziah, the sons of Hatipha.
sons of Solomon’s servants: the sons of Sotai, the sons of Sophereth, the sons
of Perida, 58the
sons of Jaala, the sons of Darkon, the sons of Giddel,
sons of Shephatiah, the sons of Hattil, the sons of Pochereth-hazzebaim, the
sons of Amon.
the temple servants and the sons of Solomon’s servants were 392.
following were those who came up from Tel-melah, Tel-harsha, Cherub, Addon, and
Immer, but they could not prove their fathers’ houses nor their descent, whether
they belonged to Israel:
sons of Delaiah, the sons of Tobiah, the sons of Nekoda, 642.
of the priests: the sons of Hobaiah, the sons of Hakkoz, the sons of Barzillai
(who had taken a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite and was called
by their name).
sought their registration among those enrolled in the genealogies, but it was
not found there, so they were excluded from the priesthood as unclean.
governor told them that they were not to partake of the most holy food until a
priest with Urim and Thummim should arise.
whole assembly together was 42,360,
their male and female servants, of whom there were 7,337. And they had 245
singers, male and female.
horses were 736, their mules 245,
camels 435, and their donkeys 6,720.
some of the heads of fathers’ houses gave to the work. The governor gave to the
treasury 1,000 daricsof
gold, 50 basins, 30 priests’ garments and 500 minasof
some of the heads of fathers’ houses gave into the treasury of the work 20,000
darics of gold and 2,200 minas of silver.
what the rest of the people gave was 20,000 darics of gold, 2,000 minas of
silver, and 67 priests’ garments.
the priests, the Levites, the gatekeepers, the singers, some of the people, the
temple servants, and all Israel, lived in their towns. And when the seventh
month had come, the people of Israel were in their towns.
Well, so far God’s holy and inerrant word. Now three
things I want us to see in this chapter tonight…
I. Nehemiah is planning for the
First of all that Nehemiah is planning for the
future. Turn back to verse 4:
“The city was wide and large, but
the people within it were few, and no houses had been rebuilt.”
They had been living, you see, in the main, outside
of the city of Jerusalem. Perhaps during the time of the rebuilding of the wall
many of them had taken lodgings within the city, but now that the wall was
finished they had gone back to live outside of the city once again. And when we
come to chapter 11 of Nehemiah we’ll see what the proportion is–that ninety
percent of the population will have been outside of the city of Jerusalem in
nearby towns and villages.
Now one of the prophecies that had influenced
Nehemiah was the prophecy of the new covenant in Jeremiah 31. In Jeremiah 31,
there’s this extraordinary prophecy. Jeremiah is prophesying that a day is
coming when God will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the
house of Judah, and part of that prophesy in Jeremiah 31 includes the
repopulation of the city of Jerusalem.
What are we supposed to make of that prophecy? Some
regard that prophecy as predicting an event perhaps when Jesus physically
returns…that He will go back to Jerusalem and something extraordinary will
happen in the physical Jerusalem that we know in Palestine or in Israel today. I
don’t accept that particular interpretation, and I rather think that that part
of Jeremiah’s prophecy refers to the new heavens and the new earth, and to the
city which has foundations, whose builder and maker is God, and that is how the
Bible ends, you remember, in Revelation 22 with a vision of the city of God
descending from God out of heaven. And Jeremiah is prophesying something
relating to Jerusalem.
Now in Nehemiah’s time (after the exile), that
prophecy has a central place, I think, in his thinking and is what drove him to
go back to Jerusalem. It’s what’s driven him to build the walls as a defensive
measure for the city of Jerusalem. But what good are walls if there’s no one
inside to defend? What good is there for the city of Jerusalem if there’s no one
And what we see now is a vision for the city. He
has a vision to populate the city of Jerusalem. You know, Nehemiah is one of
the great urban planners. It’s a hugely significant and topical issue today —
urban renewal. What do you do about a city that has become derelict, where there
are slum areas in the city, areas of dereliction, no-go areas…areas perhaps
where gangs are beginning to form? Nehemiah is dealing with that kind of thing.
He needs people to move back into the city. We’ll see in chapters 8, 9, and 10
and 11 and 12 and so on, how Nehemiah actually goes about doing that — getting
volunteers to move back into the city. It would be like asking me to move into
Belhaven. I live in Ridgeland. I live out in the country. I don’t have room for
chickens and sheep as some of these had, but you understand there’s a problem
here. How do you get people who live out in the country, who’ve perhaps got used
to country life and country social ways, to move back into the city again?
You’ve got to admire him. He’s an urban planner with a vision and a burden for
You know, the church has to have a burden for the
city, and First Presbyterian Church has to have a burden for the city. We’re
in the city. This is the city, and we need to have a burden for those who live
around us. I’m constantly fascinated by discussions we have in our staff
meetings about this very thing: how can we be an influence, how can we be salt,
how can we be light in the place that God in providence has placed us? This is
where we are, and our elders here have decided this is where we’re staying.
They’ve made that bold (and let me say courageous) decision, and I applaud them
for making that decision. But along with that comes the whole issue of how can
we be not just a source of defensiveness, but how can we be salt and a light and
a beacon in the city?
Well, that’s what Nehemiah’s dealing with. He’s
planning for the future. You notice how he puts it in verse 5 — God put it
into his heart. Don’t you love that about Nehemiah? He’s a man who’s
sensitive to the leading and guiding of God. Now don’t take that and run with
it…you know, that every urge and every inclination and every feeling that you
get this is the Lord putting it into your heart. It may be indigestion. It may
be what you ate the night before. It may be a thousand things, so you need to
ask all kinds of wise questions of those that you love, and even of those that
you don’t love, because sometimes the best advice and the truest advice will
come from those who don’t tell you what you want to hear. So all of that has to
But I find this a beautiful thing that Nehemiah is a
man who lives close to the Lord. He’s a prayerful man. He’s a man of God. He’s a
man who loves the Bible. He loves the Scriptures. He has a burden for the things
of the Lord. He has a burden to see the kingdom of God expanded, and he has a
burden for the city, for the city of Jerusalem with all of the social and
political and economic problems that come with city life in the fifth century
B.C. And we’ve already seen that many of them are just like the problems that we
are facing in 2008.
But you know, the key to his leadership…he was a man
who lived close to the Lord, and when God spoke to him, he obeyed.
However difficult, however problematic the task was, the Lord put it into his
heart. Well, what we see here first of all is Nehemiah’s concern for the future.
II. Nehemiah’s concern for the
Now secondly, what we see here is Nehemiah’s
concern for the past. Now he wants to build the city. He wants to populate
the city. He has urban renewal with all of the problems of…well, in Britain it
would be called compulsory purchase orders, and in America when
government purchases certain property, it’s called — imminent domain!
Imminent domain, and all the problems that that brings. How do you go about
that? Rezoning, moving one section of the population to another part of the
city, or maybe even outside of the city? Hugely significant and difficult
problems for a politician, for a governor. How do you go about doing that?
And do you notice what he does? He goes back to
the past. He goes back to an archival record that’s ninety years old, a list
of the original men and women and their goods (camels and horses and what they
gave), most of whom, if not all of whom…you know it’s ninety years, so most of
them if not all of them are now dead. He goes back to the past. Now why does he
do that? You know, he could have said [and forgive me], “What we need is
change!” [I mean, forgive me now!][Laughter.] “We need a new way here.”
He could have said that, but he doesn’t. He says, ‘Our future depends on our
past.’ Now think biblically with me for a minute. He’s not simply talking about
politics, you understand, so don’t necessarily equate what Nehemiah is doing
with modern America.
Think what Nehemiah is doing and equate
that with the church. What is the future of the church? Aren’t we
asking that question right now? Haven’t you filled in an extraordinarily
interesting and informative form that asks some wonderful questions because we
want to know where do we go from here? Strategic planning. Well, this is
Nehemiah’s Strategic Planning 101: you go back to the past. You start with the
Why is he doing that? Is it because he’s just an old
fuddy duddy who’s set in his ways, who can’t seem to get out of the box? You
know, he’s singing the same old song over and over … “Boring. We want something
new.” No, of course not! He’s a man of God. And who are these people over whom
he is the governor? They are the people of God. They are the Lord’s people. They
are the Lord’s covenant people. What is Nehemiah doing by going back to the past
to an archival record that’s ninety years old? He’s reminding them of who
they are. They are the sons and daughters of the heroes who came back
from Babylon, who made that four-month journey not knowing exactly what it was
they were going back to, who had built that temple, who had lived there and died
there. They wouldn’t be here if it hadn’t been for those people — this list of
people that he’s reading here. They wouldn’t be there.
You know, sometime — don’t all go at once, because
that will be a huge problem. But sometime pop your head around that History
Room. You know you don’t have to spend ten hours in there, but just walk up and
down. Look at the pictures on the wall. Now if you all go at once, that’s going
to be a problem! [Laughter.] But next time you’re there and the door is
open, pop your head in. Have a look at some of those pictures. You’ll see men
and women in those very formal clothes that they wore a hundred years ago.
You’ll see Brister Ware standing outside the church! (Who’s still alive!) [Laughter.]
“Lest we forget…lest we forget.”
It was Psalm 105 this morning: the Abrahamic
covenant… “lest we forget.” It’s been Veterans Day, the honor roll call of the
faithful who gave the ultimate sacrifice, “lest we forget.” In Britain this past
week there’s been the parallel of what you call Veterans Day…Remembrance Day.
And there’s a very solemn and moving service. It’s one of the most moving and
solemn occasions in British life. It’s called the Remembrance Service,1
in the Royal Albert Hall in London. And all of the military will gather, and
there’s a representative of the Queen if the Queen herself isn’t there. Usually
she is. And from the ceiling of the Royal Albert Hall there will fall at a
certain point a poppy leaf…a red poppy leaf…one for every soldier who has died
during the course of the First and Second World Wars and subsequent wars. And
they will just fall. And the process will last for probably five or ten minutes,
until the entire floor and all of the service men and women that are standing
there, their heads are just covered with these red petals. And the words of
Laurence Binyon’s2 poem
— a poet from the First World War:
“They shall not grow old
As we that are left grow old;
Age shall not weary them,
Nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun
And in the morning
We will remember them.”
And that’s in part what Nehemiah is doing here. He’s
reading a list which sounds really boring, but they are the heroes of the past.
It’s an honor call, “lest we forget” who we are. They hadn’t come back to
Jerusalem to make money. They hadn’t come back to Jerusalem to be stonemasons.
They hadn’t come back to Jerusalem to live out in the country with their
chickens and their sheep. They’d come back to Jerusalem to be the people of God,
the Lord’s covenant people, the sons and daughters of these faithful covenant
III. Nehemiah speaks to the
So he remembers something about the future and he
remembers something of the past, in order that he might say something about the
present. You notice how it ended. And we talked about this when we looked at
Ezra 2. He reminds them of what they had originally given to the work of
rebuilding the temple — all that gold, all that silver. And sometime when you
have a moment, go to the church library and ask: “I want to see the Persian
coin.” In a cabinet in the book room just down the corridor here…there’s a glass
cabinet, and inside there’s a tiny little Persian coin. It comes from the fifth
century BC — the very coins (at least related to the very coins) that are
mentioned right here. He might — as he did for me this morning — he might even
let you hold it in your hand. [You can’t take it out of the room! But you can
hold it in your hand.] And you know, as that tiny little silver coin was in my
hand, I thought, “I wonder if any of the people mentioned in Ezra and Nehemiah
ever touched one of these coins.” Imagine if that was so! That’s phenomenal! And
it’s here, in the library at First Presbyterian Church!
Why is he reminding them of what they had given?
Extraordinary amounts of money; generous amounts of money…to provoke this
generation to do the same. That’s why he did it. This is what your fathers
did. This is the self-sacrifice your fathers gave. They went through
depressions. It would be fascinating to see the giving at First Presbyterian
Church in the Depression of the late 1920’s and the early 1930’s. It would be
fascinating to see. And I wonder how our faith could measure up to theirs.
There’s more in this chapter than meets the eye, and it’s a challenge that we
might, like them, be out and out for the Lord.
Let’s pray together.
Father, we thank You for this portion of
Scripture. We ask that You would write it upon our hearts and spur us on to
greater acts of faith and service, and dedication for You. We ask it in Jesus’
Please stand; receive the Lord’s benediction.
Grace, mercy, and peace from God our Father and
the Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.
1. Remembrance Day.
Armistice Day celebration in the United Kingdom
Armistice Day. On the 11th hour of the 11th day of the
11th month in 1918, the formal hostilities of the First World War
In the United States it was
known as Armistice Day for many years, until 1953 when the name was changed to
Veterans Day to honor all veterans of all wars.
2. Robert Laurence Binyon.
He is best known for the poem For the Fallen,
first published in The Times in
September, 1914. The seven-verse poem honored the World War I British war dead
of that time and in particular the British Expeditionary
Force, which had by then already had high casualty rates on the
developing Western Front. The fourth verse
from that poem has gained an existence of its own and is known today as “The
Ode” – one that applies to all war dead.
© 2019 First Presbyterian Church.
This transcribed message has been lightly edited and formatted for the Web site. No attempt has been made, however, to alter the basic extemporaneous delivery style, or to produce a grammatically accurate, publication-ready manuscript conforming to an established style template.
Should there be questions regarding grammar or theological content, the reader should presume any website error to be with the webmaster/transcriber/editor rather than with the original speaker. For full copyright, reproduction and permission information, please visit the First Presbyterian Church Copyright, Reproduction & Permission statement.
To view recordings of our entire services, visit our Facebook page.